The Integrated 31-Gene Expression Profile (i31-GEP) Test for Cutaneous Melanoma Outperforms a Clinicopathologic-only Nomogram at Identifying Patients who can Forego Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
نویسندگان
چکیده
Introduction: National guidelines for cutaneous melanoma suggest avoiding sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) if the risk of SLN positivity is <5% (T1a with no high-risk features), considering SLNB 5-10% additional features (T1aHR) and T1b), offering >10% (T2-T4). Because most patients (88%) who undergo an have a negative result, novel tools to identify can safely forgo are critical. The integrated 31-gene expression profile (i31-GEP SLNB) test combines tumor molecular biology clinicopathologic provide precise positivity. Melanoma Institute Australia (MIA) developed nomogram that uses only predict positivity.
 Methods: We compared i31-GEP MIA in T1-T2 tumors complete data (n=582). precision each tool was analyzed using 95% confidence intervals. To be considered low risk, predicted must upper interval ≤10%, high-risk, lower CI ≥5%.
 Results: identified 28.5% (166/582) as having while also ≤10% 0.9% (5/582, p<0.001) nomogram. In pre-test likelihood (T1aHR-T1b), reclassified 60.2% (171/284) being or 13.7% (39/284, known status (n=466), 22.1% (103/466) 3.9% (4/103) rate 0.6% (3/466, by 33.3% (1/3) rate.
 Conclusions: outperformed identifying could forego SLNB. Integrating 31-GEP stratification provides better guide patient management tumors, whom guidance impactful.
منابع مشابه
Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy for cutaneous melanoma.
Results: Positive SLNs were detected in 39 (15%) of 260 cases, including 0 (0%) of 45 for cutaneous melanomas 1.0 mm thick or less (T1), 21 (18%) of 115 for melanomas 1.01 to 2.0 mm thick (T2), 12 (19%) of 64 for melanomas 2.01 to 4.0 mm thick (T3), and 5 (16%) of 32 for melanomas thicker than 4.0 mm (T4). Median Breslow depths were 1.89 mm for SLN-positive biopsy specimens and 1.50 mm for SLN-...
متن کاملRadioguided sentinel lymph node biopsy in malignant cutaneous melanoma.
The procedure of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with malignant cutaneous melanoma has evolved from the notion that the tumor drains in a logical way through the lymphatic system, from the first to subsequent levels. As a consequence, the first lymph node encountered (the sentinel node) will most likely be the first affected by metastasis; therefore, a negative sentinel node makes it hig...
متن کاملSentinel lymph node biopsy in melanoma patients: An experience with Tc-99m antimony sulfide colloid
Introduction: Sentinel lymph node biopsy is the standard procedure for lymph node staging in intermediate thickness melanoma. In Iran, this procedure has not been addressed sufficiently. In this study, we report our experience in this area. Methods: Ten consecutive patients with intermediate thickness melanoma where included in our study. 1.5 mCi of Tc-99m antimony...
متن کاملSentinel lymph node biopsy correctly predicts regional lymph node recurrence in trunk malignant melanoma with multiple drainage basins
We report a young male with an initial excisional biopsy report of melanoma of the lower back, referred to our hospital for complete excision and sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy. Four peritumoral intradermal Tc-99m phytate injection was performed and SLNs were detected in both axillary and right inguinal regions. On the biopsy only the right axillary SLN was metastatic leading to right axilla...
متن کاملRadiation exposure of the surgeons in sentinel lymph node biopsy
Background: Sentinel node biopsy (SLNB) is the standard of care for breast cancer treatment and it is getting wide acceptance in Iran. The radiation safety of the procedure has been investigated under controlled conditions, but the standard dose of radiotracer and techniques are not always observed in the community setting. The aim of this study was to assess the magnitude of the absor...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Skin
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['2574-1624']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25251/skin.6.6.3